Toppliste

Thanks for the tip. I've used the printed Kviteseid Bygdesoga (with a lot of cutting and pasting into Google Translate) with a prior family who was listed in the Ættesoga, however, the current family I'm working on isn't in the Ættesoga, so I'm definitely struggling with some of the church records without the genealogies to give me clues for deciphering the handwriting. Great to see the genealogies are being constantly updated. I'll definitely check out the website!

No, these are two different persons. On the first page, dated 1750, Johannes Olsen age 4 was the son of Ole Johanssen (deceased) and Inger Andersdatter. On the next page, dated 1756, Jon Olssøn (deceased), was married to Karen Nielsdatter and had 5 children.

Takk for denne meldingen. Jeg skal jobbe videre selv og komme tilbake her.

Here is an overview over the census (male register) 1701 - censuses from several parts of Norway are lacking - including Buskerud county: https://www.digitalarkivet.no/en/search/sources?s=&from=&to=&format=all&archive_key=&jt[]=38 Here is the contents of the 1701 census for Solør, Østerdal og Odal fogderi. Larvik grevskap: https://media.digitalarkivet.no/ft/contents/38449 Ringerike og Hallingdal fogderi - mangler = is lacking

These dates refer to when the probate process began and ended In the probate he is referred to as “afglⁿᵉ” – “deceased”, and there is a cross behind his name on the index card indicating that as well.

Thank you both. Farmer makes more sense as the father is listed as a hussman (cotter farmer) in other records, and some pages I've seen have multiple entries with that word, which would be more likely for cotters than saw mill owners. Based on your transcriptions I did some internet searching, though the only thing that came up was from Google AI. It says: "Brugemand is a Danish term that roughly translates to "man of the farm" or "farmer". It also say: "Brugsmand" refers to a person who worked or used a piece of land, often as a tenant farmer or day laborer". However, it doesn't say where it got that information and I didn't find any actual sources for that information. I'm ok with AI if it actually provides its sources; in this case it didn't. I imagine "bruksmann" and "brugsmand" are alternate spellings in an era where spelling was a bit loose. Thanks again for your help. .

Tusen takk for svar, Even ☺️. Jeg får søke videre etter dette paret

novel... ChatGPT er framleis ein lystløgnar. ChatGPT seier vel kva som er sannsynleg at det står (basert på det det har "lært"), ikkje kva som faktisk står. Overflatisk sett er ikkje skøytet er heilt gale oppsummert... (det skøyte har til sams med andre skøyte) Men det er mykje som er feil (skyld; pantegjeld, vitne, dato for tinget) og mange ting manglar (t.d. lausøyret) Kåret er stort sett berre tull... Du kan godt freiste ei tyding sjølv, og så kanskje få denne korrigert her.